Copy
In this current moment we’re in, it is tempting to look for solutions perpetually. When reflecting on our fatigue and lack of creativity in online discourse, we might identity problems; for example, the Zoom grid we find ourselves in is symmetrical, where our identities are not.

At this point, there are two avenues to explore: the technological or the humanistic. The technological one might look for new digital means to break that–for example, Microsoft’s shared background in video calls–to create a shared sense of space. But that is, a pseudo-space: and in fact, a pseudo-reality. Solutionism relies on simulation.

The psychological, humanistic approach will accept reality for what it is and ask for additional thoughtfulness and reflection from those in the grid. I intentionally avoid the term matrix, which came up in a recent conversation. The matrix, being a fictional, pseudo concept, is in itself a form of mediation. When we operate in pseudo-spaces, we compromise for pseudo-identities and mediation of creativity.

Solutionism comes with a cost: more technology creates more mediation, adds fraction to communication, and makes it harder for individuals to wholly show-up, and develop a space of co-creation and thirdness.

Thank you for reading, 
Nitzan
@byedit
Copyright © 2020 Future-of.Agency, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can
update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.