Copy
Outlier Ventures Weekly Brief Issue #14  View Online
 
  contact@outlierventures.io
 No such thing as decentralised governance
 
Earlier this week, a new era was marked as Aragon’s blockchain was used to issue legal shares in an organisation. An era in which corporate governance, asset ownership and blockchains converge to create a new type of organisation that were previously impossible. Between security token offerings (STOs) and the rise of new Moloch DAOs, decentralised governance or more specifically decision-making is becoming increasingly important in the space. But at this early stage, there are more questions than answers. What decisions are appropriate for “on-chain” governance? All decisions? Just budgetary decisions? Or just network upgrade decisions? Do we follow traditional principles of community building or stick to how things are handled in software development? Our head of research Lawrence Lundy-Bryan, explored some of these questions in his latest piece arguing that “separation of powers” offers a powerful constitutional model for crypto networks. We take a look at how the model could be implemented in token networks in today's issue of the newsletter.
 

The Executive
A network executive would be responsible for the deployment, maintenance and upgrade of networks. Currently, these responsibilities fall upon a core development team as a function of the fact the team generally seeded the idea and early builds. Community proposals are a part of the process but proposals are complicated, time-consuming, and despite best efforts tend to consolidate around a few key individuals. Also, we lack a constructive mechanism for executive change. Although forks are commonly used, which is voting by another name. There is a risk that continued forks reduce overall trust and understanding in crypto-networks by average users and application developers. For crypto-networks to have billions of users, there needs to be stable networks that can be trusted to deliver on a roadmap.

The Legislative
Crypto networks cannot rely on a development team alone. They need a legislative equivalent. A parliament or Congress to hold the executive to account and limit the consolidation of power. Foundation models used by Ethereum, Tezos and others are an early variant of this, and Sovrin and the Trust Framework gets even closer. This would be a body that would represent the needs of network stakeholders and would be a solution to the vote fatigue and policy understanding that comes from a more direct democracy/liquid democracy. DAOs and tools by Aragon could offer some solutions here. But by appointing domain experts to legislative functions, a network could benefit from the expertise provided by them instead of relying on the so-called “wisdom of the crowds”.

The Judiciary
Although code has at times been considered law, as crypto networks scale, they will have to effectively manage conflict-resolution between stakeholders. Some of this might be able to managed completely in the digital realm with incentives and reputation, in many cases there will need to a real-world system to tap into. Systems like Aragon, Kleros and Mattereum are exploring what a conflict-resolution system might look like with differing degrees of automation. Courts are used there will always be an interpretive aspect of law and contracts. Language is an inherently loose form of communication. The idea that code can be law is a nice one, and maybe one day with AI lawyers facing off against AI lawyers that might be the case. But for the moment, some basic form of conflict-resolution to resolve network conflicts will be valuable to provide the necessary trust to onboard billions and user and dollars.
 

 
We aren’t building businesses so corporate governance won't work. We aren’t just building economies so economics alone won’t work. We are building global communities... I’m afraid we are going to need politics. Blockchains have given us the tools to improve governance and fix many of the misaligned incentives in national governance systems. But we still need the robust separation of powers model to provide checks and balances as we experiment with different levels of automation and decentralised decision-making. We need a crypto trias politica.
 
 
Interesting Reads For The Weekend
 
 
1. Datascience is different now -  Github

2. The decade we almost stopped climate change  - New York Times

3. Hormones United - Aeon

4. Breaking The Unicorn Myth - Medium
 
 
 
tw
 
Regulating ‘machine learning’ always seems to me like regulating databases. It’s the wrong layer of abstraction. We don’t regulate databases. We regulate the use cases - we regulate credit card companies and insurance companies.​
tw
 
tw
 
in
 
 
    Email a Friend  
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list
This email is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. No one else may place any reliance upon, copy or forward all or any form of this email in any way. If any addressing or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify us immediately by responding to us directly, and ensure that the email and any attachments are immediately and permanently deleted and is not used, disclosed, copied, printed or relied upon in any manner. In no event shall Outlier Ventures Operations Ltd or Outlier Capital LLP be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental special, punitive or other damages, whatsoever (including without limitation, damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, or loss of business information), even if Outlier Ventures Operations Ltd or Outlier Capital LLP have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Outlier Ventures Operations Ltd may monitor email traffic data and also the content of this email for the purposes of security.

Outlier Ventures Operations Ltd is registered in England and Wales, company registration number 10722638. Outlier Ventures Operations Ltd is an appointed representative of Sapia Partners LLP which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (Firm Reference Number 550103).

Crypto-currencies can be extremely volatile and subject to rapid fluctuations in price, positively or negatively. Investment in one or more crypto-currencies may not be suitable for even a relatively experienced and affluent investor. Each potential investor must make their own informed decision in connection with any such investment (after having sought independent financial advice thereon).

The content provided in this email is provided for information purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation to enter into any proposed transaction or investment.

In this email you will find links to other websites; they are for your convenience or to provide additional information, they are not an endorsement or a financial promotion. Outlier Ventures Operations Ltd Is not responsible for any contents, data, opinions and or reliability of the linked websites, and does not necessarily endorse views expressed on the linked website, and does not accept liability for the accuracy or completeness of any such information or opinions which can be subject to change without notice.
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list






This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Outlier Ventures Operations Ltd · C/O Milsted Langdon LLP · 46-48 East Smithfield · London, Middlesex E1W1AW · United Kingdom